
AI adoption is increasingly constrained not by capability, but by trust. As systems move into regulated, safety-critical, and liability-sensitive use cases, organizations need to demonstrate two things: that AI risk is governed systematically, and that residual exposure can be transferred. AI risk is now operational, financial, and legal—and the market is converging on a practical question: What evidence demonstrates responsible AI governance, and how confident can I be that my insurance will respond when it matters?
ISO/IEC 42001 is the first international management system standard dedicated to safe, responsible AI development and use, establishing a lifecycle framework for governance that spans leadership accountability, policies and objectives, risk and impact assessments, operational controls, performance monitoring, and continuous improvement. Under this standard, AI governance becomes auditable—reframing AI not as isolated models, but as a managed socio-technical system embedded in enterprise risk management.
ISO/IEC 42001 is quickly becoming a market signal in its own right. Over 200 organizations have already been certified voluntarily, and a growing number of enterprises are embedding its requirements into procurement and RFPs to standardize vendor governance expectations.
Insurers already rely on international standards as underwriting signals in other complex domains. Examples include ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II for cyber risk and liability, ISO 14001 for environmental risk and pollution liability, ISO 9001 for quality management and general liability, and ASTM standards for construction safety and professional liability. Armilla is pioneering the same standards-based approach for AI, using ISO/IEC 42001-aligned governance evidence alongside technical evaluation to underwrite safer, more responsible AI with greater precision.
Confidence in AI governance is maturing through ISO/IEC 42001 certification, but traditional insurance has not kept pace. Most policies in the market today were not designed with AI risk in mind, leaving coverage ambiguous, inconsistent, or silent for claims tied to AI use. Large insurers are responding by exploring explicit restrictions, sub-limits, or exclusions for generative AI and AI agents—and the practical result is a widening gap: governance signals are getting stronger, while coverage certainty is increasingly at risk.
At the same time, with AI incidents, regulation, and litigation on the rise, enterprises are increasingly focused on dedicated AI liability protection. Research from the Geneva Association indicates that more than 90% of corporate insurance buyers are seeking dedicated insurance coverage for generative AI, including standalone AI insurance, reflecting a growing awareness that AI introduces novel and material liability exposure that existing programs were never built to address.
Armilla was founded to build justified trust in AI through evaluation and measurement. In translating governance frameworks like ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF into technical evaluation and underwriting inputs about real-world AI performance and reliability, Armilla pioneered the foundation for AI insurance. Backed by Lloyd's of London and A-rated insurers, Armilla offers the certainty around AI liability protection that is helping accelerate confident AI adoption, from generative AI to AI agents.
Until now, the three pillars of responsible AI—governance, certification, and insurance—have largely operated in isolation. Organizations implement governance frameworks, pursue certification to validate their efforts, and separately seek insurance to transfer residual risk. But without connection between them, each pillar is weaker than it could be: governance lacks external validation, certification lacks economic consequence, and insurance lacks the evidence it needs to underwrite with confidence.
A-LIGN and Armilla have joined forces to bridge these three worlds. A-LIGN provides independent AI certification, producing validated evidence of AI governance maturity, while Armilla incorporates that signal alongside technical evaluation results that measure performance and reliability in practice. The result is a single framework in which governance maturity and technical performance become decision-grade underwriting inputs.
For organizations pursuing ISO/IEC 42001 assessment or certification through A-LIGN, this means clearer pathways to insurability, and the potential to qualify for preferential terms on Armilla's AI liability insurance. It also means a defensible risk narrative as AI use scales across products, operations, and customer-facing processes.
Linking ISO/IEC 42001 to underwriting transforms governance into an economic signal—one where stronger governance can influence insurability, pricing, and coverage scope, aligning incentives around accountable AI at scale. This is how markets mature: not through voluntary commitments alone, but through mechanisms that reward responsible behavior with tangible benefits.
When governance evidence flows into underwriting, organizations gain more than insurance. They gain a shared language for AI risk that spans technical teams, legal counsel, procurement, and the boardroom. They gain defensibility—the ability to show regulators, partners, and customers that AI deployment rests on auditable foundations. And they gain confidence, knowing that as AI capabilities advance, their risk posture can advance in step.
ISO/IEC 42001 provides the governance foundation. Independent assessment provides credibility. Purpose-built AI insurance provides protection. Together, they bridge the three worlds of safe, responsible AI—and make durable, defensible AI deployment not just possible, but practical.
Organizations ready to connect AI governance to insurability can begin today. Contact A-LIGN to explore ISO/IEC 42001 certification, or reach out to Armilla to learn how AI insurance can support your AI adoption strategy. The path from responsible AI to insurable AI is now clear—and the time to take it is now.